🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A bukkit (minecraft server) plugin that allows player to paint on map.
JavaPen-based interaction UML (Unified Modeling Language) diagram editor.
JavaExploitation for CVE-2021-3679 and document for its fix
ShellA bukkit (minecraft server) plugin that provides redstone mechs on map.
JavaA bukkit (minecraft server) plugin whose theme is magick.
JavaA bukkit (minecraft server) plugin that could load plugin of other scripting languages.
Java🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Account age 12 years but contribution years hit 14? You're time-traveling on GitHub. Total stars under 100, highest repo only 30 stars, yet you slap 1 PR to asmjit (4540 stars) on your resume like it'
aegistudio — 67.50/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 12-year GitHub account whose total original project star count is lower than the star count of the smallest popular repo it has ever contributed to, with most external work being window dressing rather than substantive engineering.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 12.57 years registered, active across 14 contribution years; you've been on GitHub longer than many current senior devs have been writing code, but all that tenure hasn't translated to any meaningful original project traction. |
| Original project quality | 9.6/18 | 29 original repos with 94 total stars, top starred original repo is MapPainting (a Minecraft bukkit plugin) with 30 stars, highest quality repo is RingBufferDetonator (CVE exploit PoC) with a 0.9 quality score that hasn't been updated since 2021; your home turf is a code wasteland with no project gaining meaningful adoption. |
| Contribution quality | 21.6/27 | 74 merged PRs out of 75 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 self-closed external PR, 5 recent trivial PRs, 31% of recent external PRs target docs/site/examples for popular projects; you're great at getting PRs merged, but most of your external work is polishing other people's windows rather than rebuilding their engines. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 9.5/20 | 2 total PRs + 2 commits into popular repos across your entire career (1 core engineering fix for asmjit/asmjit, 1 doc-like update for libinjection/libinjection); your ecosystem impact is so minimal it's barely a footnote in the commit history of the projects you've touched. |
| Community influence | 4.8/8 | 75 followers, 43 following; your follower count is lower than the number of open issues across your top 3 starred repos, and you have no visible community leadership or project adoption to justify a larger audience. |
| Activity authenticity | 12/17 | 180 contributions in the last year, but 110 days of no public activity since your last push; your contribution pattern is a series of short, intense bursts followed by long radio silence, not consistent, sustained open source work. |
| Red flags |
- 110 days of no public activity following a year of 180 contributions, indicating inconsistent long-term engagement rather than steady open source participation.
- Nearly a third of recent external PRs target docs, examples, and README updates for popular projects rather than core code changes, signaling a focus on contribution quantity over substantive engineering impact.
- Total stars across all 29 original repos is just 94, with no original project breaking 30 stars, indicating minimal traction for self-driven work. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your low-impact original projects, doc-heavy external contributions, and minimal ecosystem footprint, so no additional bump or haircut was applied. Verdict Normal, unremarkable open source participant. You show up occasionally to polish other people's projects and tinker with personal side projects, but you have never built a body of work that signals meaningful engineering impact or community influence worth prioritizing for collaboration or trust.