GitHub Roast
@gaearonThis open-source track record has real weight
AnonymousProject quality checks out
@yyx990803Community signal is loud
AnonymousThose tags say more than a resume
@sindresorhusLooks like a Hall of Fame regular
AnonymousScore and attention both hold up
@torvaldsWorth opening the GitHub profile
AnonymousHard to argue with this score
@gaearonThis open-source track record has real weight
AnonymousProject quality checks out
@yyx990803Community signal is loud
AnonymousThose tags say more than a resume
@sindresorhusLooks like a Hall of Fame regular
AnonymousScore and attention both hold up
@torvaldsWorth opening the GitHub profile
AnonymousHard to argue with this score
← Back to Hall of Fame
@chilfish
GitHub just is a cloud disk )
chilfish
71.00/100
💪 SOLID
Solid · Trustworthy
#微博归档匠#开源收藏家#PR 游侠#油猴脚本佬#赛博囤货王#Weibo Archivist#Fork Hoarder#PR Drifter#Userscript Dev#Cyber Hoarder

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality10.8 / 18
Contribution quality22.0 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact8.7 / 20
Community influence4.1 / 8
Activity authenticity15.4 / 17

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
TypeScript86%
Vue5%
Kotlin3%
JavaScript3%
CSS1%
Go1%
Domains
vuenuxtarchiverbackuptampermonkeyviolentmonkeyweibochatappdemo-appjetpack-composematerailsocket-io

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 6 years on GitHub with only 50 followers, following 74 people like a simp; your best project is a Weibo backup userscript with 473 stars, all other original repos are sub-4-star trash; you only have 1

Chilfish — 71.00/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: Long-running, low-drama contributor whose open-source résumé is 90% a 473-star Weibo backup script and self-hosted PRs, with barely any footprint in other people's popular projects.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 6.42 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 6 days ago. No ghost gaps or hibernation periods to excuse.
Original project quality10.8/1820 original repos with 496 total stars; 473 of those stars are concentrated on the top-starred Weibo-archiver Tampermonkey utility (quality score 0.65), while the remaining 19 original repos have a combined 23 stars, maxing out at 4 stars per repo. The entire original project portfolio is one niche hit and 19 unused toy projects, no broader engineering substance to speak of.
Contribution quality22/2782 merged PRs out of 84 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 2 author-closed own-repo PRs, 0 external trivial/farming PRs. Clean record with zero rejections, but half of all merged PRs target his own top-starred repo — he contributes to his own work more than anyone else's, which is fine, just not exactly broad ecosystem value.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact8.7/20All-time popular-repo contributions total 2 (1 merged PR + 1 commit) into the 6,985-star un-pany/v3-admin-vite repo, with no verified file-level quality sample available to confirm the changes weren't trivial UI polish or docs tweaks. Two total contributions to a big external project over 6 years is a drive-by, not meaningful ecosystem impact.
Community influence4.1/850 followers, 74 following — he follows more accounts than follow him, with no viral breakout beyond the niche user base of his Weibo backup script.
Activity authenticity15.4/171221 contributions in the last year, 3 distinct activity types (commits, PRs, issues), no templated PR flooding, no star inflation, no trivial PR farming signals. Activity is real and consistent, no bot-like patterns.

Red flags

  • All-time contributions to other people's popular repositories top out at 1 merged PR and 1 commit, with no file-level change sample available to confirm the work wasn't trivial polish on a big project.
  • 50% of all merged PRs target his own top-starred Weibo-archiver repository, meaning his external contribution footprint is effectively negligible.
  • No recent merged PR sample is available for review, so the quality of his most recent contribution work can't be independently verified.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for his limited external ecosystem impact and single-hit original project star distribution, with no missed qualitative signals that would justify a score change.

Verdict Normal, low-drama open-source contributor who builds useful niche tools for a small, specific user base, but has no meaningful impact on the broader open-source ecosystem. No behavior red flags, just narrow, self-focused contribution scope.

📌 Pin to your GitHub profile

Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.

Badge
GitHub Roast score badge
Markdown
[![GitHub Roast score badge](https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/chilfish)](https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish)
HTML
<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/chilfish" alt="GitHub Roast score badge" /></a>
Flex card
Dark card
GitHub Roast dark
Light card
GitHub Roast light
Markdown · Dark card
[![GitHub Roast](https://githubroast.dev/api/card/chilfish?theme=dark)](https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish)
Markdown · Light card
[![GitHub Roast](https://githubroast.dev/api/card/chilfish?theme=light)](https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish)
HTML · Dark card
<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/chilfish?theme=dark" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>
HTML · Light card
<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/chilfish"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/chilfish?theme=light" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>