🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A `tracing` crate layer that logs in Perfetto trace packet format.
RustAn iced webview widget with chromium embedded framework.
RustRust bindings for https://github.com/google/dawn
RustForce monomorphizing on a generic function.
RustRead rust-lang rfcs everyday.
RustRun Rust code inside Racket.
Racket🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 7 original repos with only 53 total stars, 46 fork repos acting as a dusty bookmark folder, 22% PR rejection rate, and you still bill yourself as an elite Rust dev? Your following list has 1 person —
csmoe — 87.50/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: Shipped real core work to the Rust compiler and major ecosystem crates, but his home repo lineup is starved for attention and his 22% PR rejection rate is a quiet embarrassment.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 8.4 years on GitHub, active across 9 contribution years, last activity 13 days ago |
| Original project quality | 10.5/18 | 7 original repos, total 53 stars, top repo (iced-webview) scored 0.95 for code quality, but the star count is negligible for a dev with 8+ years on the platform |
| Contribution quality | 26.2/27 | 137 merged PRs out of 220 total, but 38 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs and a 22% rejection rate mean more than 1 in 5 submissions get the boot |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 56 PRs + 46 commits into popular repos (all-time), including 23 PRs and 16 commits to rust-lang/rust (114k stars) — real core work, even if his own repos can't pull a crowd |
| Community influence | 6.1/8 | 112 followers, only following 1 account — either he's too busy shipping compiler code to curate a feed, or he's just really picky about who he follows |
| Activity authenticity | 14.7/17 | 216 contributions last year across 4 activity types, no signs of ghost or templated activity |
Red flags
- 22% maintainer PR rejection rate: 38 of 220 total PRs were closed unmerged by project maintainers, indicating a meaningful portion of his upstream submissions don't meet project standards.
- Home repo audience drought: 7 original repos have only 53 combined stars, with just 2 repos clearing 10 stars, while 46 fork repos suggest he prioritizes curating others' work over building his own project audience.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for his strong rust-lang/rust core contributions, tiny home repo star count, and 22% maintainer PR rejection rate.
Verdict Prioritize this dev for core Rust ecosystem roles: he's already shipped real compiler-level work, even if his home repo presence is underwhelming and his PRs get bounced more than he'd like.