🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6.7 years on GitHub and only 9 total stars? Following 85 accounts but just 19 followers? 9 of your 15 merged PRs are self-serve commits to your own repos, while external work is either README tweaks o
huyixi — 66.90/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: 6.7 years of consistent daily GitHub activity, but nearly all work is self-directed on zero-star personal repos, with external contributions limited to trivial docs and UI tweaks — you show up, but nothing you build makes other developers care.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 6.7 years old, 8 active contribution years, 2938 contributions last year, last activity 1 day ago — you show up every day, but showing up isn't the same as shipping something people care about. |
| Original project quality | 7/18 | 107 original repos, 98 non-empty, but only 9 total stars across all of them; your top-starred repo is CoolShell-ebook (6 stars, a repackaged collection of another person's blog posts), and your most complex original project rsswise has 0 stars — your home turf is a graveyard of half-finished ideas no one has bothered to star. |
| Contribution quality | 17.4/27 | 15 total merged PRs (9 to your own repos, 6 to external projects), 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 0 self-closed external PRs; 2 recent trivial PRs (a 4-byte SCSS margin fix and a README space tweak) make up 13% of your recent merged work, and half your external PRs orbit docs/README updates — you don't get PRs rejected, but you also don't submit anything worth fighting to merge. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 13.6/20 | 3 PRs + 4 commits into popular repos (★57552 tw93/Mole, ★2276 web-infra-dev/rspress, ★761 AlistGo/docs) all-time; verified samples include one small feature PR to Mole and one doc update to AlistGo docs — you've touched big projects, but only enough to add a tiny convenience feature or fix a typo, not enough to move the needle for anyone. |
| Community influence | 3/8 | 19 followers, 85 following — you follow 4.5x more accounts than follow you, a textbook sign you're curating other people's work instead of building an audience of your own. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.9/17 | 2938 contributions last year, 3 distinct activity types, no bot or farming signals — your activity is 100% real, just almost entirely directed at your own repos with zero external traction. |
Red flags
- All-time merged PR count is only 15, with nearly all recent work being direct commits to your own repositories rather than cross-project contributions.
- Every external contribution is low-substance: one small feature PR to a 57k-star repo, one trivial UI fix, and three doc/README update PRs to smaller external projects.
- Only 9 total stars across 107 original repositories, meaning none of your personal projects have gained any meaningful public recognition.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already prices in your low star count, docs-heavy external work, and lack of substantive cross-project impact.
Verdict A normal, unremarkable open-source participant. You put in the time and keep your repos active, but you haven't built anything that resonates with other developers, and your external contributions are too small to register as meaningful impact. Your GitHub profile reads like a personal project diary and a bookmark folder, not a portfolio of engineering work.