🔥 Only 22 followers and 0 following, 414 of your 585 stars come from a nav site, half of your 16 PRs are self-promotion on your 0-star repo, you even self-closed a trivial external PR, and 7 of your hig
TL;DR: High check-in volume almost entirely self-served in his own repos, with a star portfolio propped up by a single navigation site and almost no verifiable external ecosystem impact.
Dimension
Score
Notes
Account maturity
8.5/10
Registered 4.71 years, active across 6 contribution years with activity as recent as today — a long runway that never took off into meaningful external impact.
Original project quality
11.5/18
79 original repos with 585 total stars, headlined by a 414-star navigation site (next-web-nav) and a 127-star desktop pet app (bongo-cat-next) — the star count looks impressive until you realize almost all of it comes from two consumer-facing side projects, not engineering tooling.
Contribution quality
15.4/27
10 merged PRs out of 16 total, 9% maintainer rejection rate, and a trivial external PR to ProseMirror that was self-closed — the only external PRs in the recent sample are half-baked fixes to other people's projects, while the vast majority of your PRs are self-merged in your own repos.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact
12.9/20
8 PRs and 2 commits spread across 4 popular ecosystem repos (including TanStack/virtual and rolldown/tsdown), but only 1 of those contributions has a verified file sample, and none of the high-star external work is confirmed to be core engineering rather than docs/site/frontend touch-ups.
Community influence
5.1/8
22 followers and 0 following — a follower ratio so lopsided it's almost a performance art piece, with no social clout to back up any claim of ecosystem influence.
Activity authenticity
15.5/17
1414 contributions last year across 3 activity types, with activity stretching back 6 years and hitting as recently as today — the volume is real, but almost all of it is self-serve PRs in your own repos rather than meaningful external engagement.
Red flags
Only 1 of your 8 all-time popular-repo contributions has a verified file sample; the other 7 are unvetted, so we have no way to confirm most of your external ecosystem work isn't just window dressing.
Your recent PR sample is almost entirely made up of self-merged PRs to your own deep-code repo, making your current external contribution activity effectively invisible.
You have exactly 2 recent external PRs, both to ProseMirror, one of which is a trivial 5-line fix that you closed yourself — that's not ecosystem engagement, that's a drive-by.
None of your high-star external contributions are verified as core engineering work, so your claims of ecosystem impact are built on unproven sand.
Score calibration
No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for the thin external contribution footprint, unvetted popular-repo work, and star haul dominated by a single navigation side project.
Verdict
A perfectly average, unremarkable GitHub account — you put in the check-in work on your own projects, but you haven't built verifiable external impact, core engineering contributions, or community clout to rise above the noise.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
