🔥 Rated as top-tier after 6 years on GitHub, but 81 contributions to high-star repos have zero verifiable file samples, and core contribution count is wrongly 0? Your 'top-tier' status is basically KPI
TL;DR: A 6-year tenured, high-output open-source veteran with genuine, usable Minecraft-focused original projects and massive all-time ecosystem impact, with only a minor file-level sample coverage gap as a caveat.
Dimension
Score
Notes
Account maturity
10/10
Registered 6.3 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 1 day ago — this isn't a weekend hobby account, it's a 6-year open-source habit you can set your watch to.
Original project quality
11.6/18
34 non-empty original repos, 547 total stars, top repo TrollHack (201 ★, usable Minecraft utility mod, quality score 0.75) and Alpha-Piscium (147 ★, public shaderpack, quality score 0.85) — zero profile/config/list filler repos, every original project is an actual usable tool for the Minecraft ecosystem, not just a resume prop.
Contribution quality
22/27
241 merged PRs out of 269 total PRs, only 8 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (3% rejection rate), 9 self-closed external PRs (author withdrew their own work, not rejected) — the PR hit rate is so good you'd think maintainers are handing out merges like candy, not bouncing almost any submissions.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact
17.5/20
81 PRs and 663 commits across 12 high-star ecosystem repos including zhukunpenglinyutong/jetbrains-cc-gui (4,159 ★), IrisShaders (3,762 ★), KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Reflect (844 ★), and lambda-client/lambda-legacy (615 ★) — all-time contribution footprint is massive, though the specific split between core engineering and docs/site/tooling work for these PRs is unverified due to missing file-level samples (explicitly not penalized per scoring rules).
Community influence
6.8/8
313 followers, 94 following — healthy 3.3:1 follower-to-following ratio, no follow-for-follow simp spree, the follower count is earned from real project work, not a follower filter scheme.
Activity authenticity
16.7/17
1,547 contributions in the last year, active as recently as 1 day ago, zero recent trivial PRs, zero templated PR flooding — the activity is consistent, organic, and tied to actual project work, not contribution KPI farming.
Red flags
All 81 all-time popular-repo PRs lack file-level quality samples, so the specific split between core engineering and docs/site/examples/tooling work for these contributions is unverified (this is a data coverage gap, not a score penalty per guidelines).
Score calibration
No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects all verified signals, with no qualitative misses identified that would warrant a bump or haircut.
Verdict
A top-tier, high-trust open-source contributor with real, usable original projects and heavy all-time ecosystem impact; the only caveat is unverified file-level samples for his popular-repo PRs, a data coverage gap that in no way undermines his track record.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
