← Back to Hall of Fame
🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality11.2 / 18
Contribution quality21.0 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.3 / 20
Community influence5.9 / 8
Activity authenticity15.1 / 17
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
SPT-Fuyu⭐ 105
Bypass EFT install validate of SPT Aki
CZhangBing-Injector⭐ 17
感谢张兵大神的WHQL签名驱动，让我们可以愉快地进行DLL注入实验！
C++Samidare⭐ 12
CS2 external pen-test. (WIP)
C++Usugumo⭐ 10
A Windows kernel-mode driver that proxies RPM/WPM/mouse_event/keybd_event .etc
C++Rensen⭐ 19
CS2 External Cheat
C++saphire⭐ 14
modified saphire(legendware base)
C++🧬 Stack & domains
Top languages
C++81%
C15%
HTML1%
C#1%
Shell0%
Python0%
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 A 6-year account with 27 forks out of 81 repos, top original repo only has 105 stars, all projects are game cheats, DLL injectors and course-bypassing tools. Contributed 28 PRs to cheat ecosystems lik
M3351AN — 71.50/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Your GitHub is a cheat tool storefront with 251 stars and a laundry list of hack projects, and the only thing more inflated than your SPT-Fuyu star count is the original Elite score that ignored your entire footprint of game cheat and crack tooling.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.12 years ago, active for 7 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — six years on the platform, seven years of contributions, and you’ve used every single one to build cheat tools; consistency is a virtue, even when the product is garbage. |
| Original project quality | 11.2/18 | 54 original repos, 251 total stars, top repo SPT-Fuyu (105 stars, 0.8 quality score, a game bypass tool) — your home turf is a toolshop for game hacks, not a software portfolio, and the quality cap reflects that narrow, low-value use case. |
| Contribution quality | 21/27 | 71 merged PRs out of 95 total, 6 maintainer-closed unmerged, 14 self-closed external PRs, 2 self-closed own-repo PRs, 14 recent trivial PRs — your PR volume is just cheat-ecosystem janitorial work, not meaningful open-source contribution. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 18.3/20 | 28 all-time PRs and 32 commits into popular repos, but nearly all target cheat/hack ecosystems, plus a trivial PR to leachim6/hello-world was counted as impact — your ecosystem reach is limited to the underground cheat scene, not legitimate open-source. |
| Community influence | 5.9/8 | 78 followers, 18 following, 251 total stars across 81 repos — your follower count is just other cheat devs and script kiddies, not real community trust. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.1/17 | 952 contributions last year, 3 activity types — most are sync commits to your own cheat repos and trivial PRs to other cheat projects, so your activity is just toolshop maintenance, not genuine open-source work. |
| Red flags |
- Your entire public repo portfolio is centered on game cheat tools, CS2 cheats, game bypass utilities, and software crack tools, which violate GitHub's Terms of Service and carry potential legal risk.
- Your external contributions almost exclusively target the cheat/hack ecosystem (YimMenu, Osiris, cs2-dumper, TKazer/CS2_External, etc.), spreading negative impact to the broader open-source community.
- The original scoring system counted trivial contributions (e.g. a PR to leachim6/hello-world, LICENSE year updates) as meaningful ecosystem impact, leading to a grossly inflated 81.5 Elite tier that does not reflect your actual contribution value or compliance risk.
- You have 14 self-closed external PRs, indicating a pattern of submitting low-quality or unwanted contributions to other projects and bailing when they don't land. Score calibration The original 81.5 score failed to account for the severe compliance and ecosystem risks of your cheat/crack tool portfolio, so a 10-point dock was applied to bring the score in line with actual contribution value. No further adjustment was needed. Verdict This account requires prioritization for compliance review due to its heavy focus on cheat, hack, and crack tooling that violates platform terms and carries legal risk, with a final adjusted score of 71.5 (SOLID tier) that reflects its limited legitimate open-source value.