🔥 You dropped 72 PRs and 48 commits into PaddlePaddle's 24k-star repo, yet all your 23 original repos have a combined total of 1 star, you hoard 25 forks, and you follow 19 people while only 9 follow yo
TL;DR: Heavy on templated API-compatibility patches for PaddlePaddle, light on original project value, and your home turf is a starless wasteland—solid ecosystem grunt work, zero standalone signal.
Dimension
Score
Notes
Account maturity
9.5/10
Registered 5.61 years, active across 7 contribution years—you've been on GitHub longer than most of your original repos have had any stars.
Original project quality
4.5/18
23 original repos, total combined stars = 1, top-starred original repo (Agent) quality score 0.3—your best original project is a LangChain agent template with fewer stars than a bug report, your "llama" repo is just redistributed Meta Llama 2 weights, and 22 of your 23 original repos sit at a lonely 0 stars.
Contribution quality
20.1/27
80 merged PRs out of 123 total; 10 maintainer-closed unmerged, 14 author-closed external PRs, 1 author-closed own-repo PR. 67% of recent merged PRs follow the same [API Compatibility] template, and only 3 of 50 recent merged PRs touch docs/site/examples—you're not spamming, you're just on a very repetitive assembly line.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact
13.2/20
72 PRs + 48 commits into ★23,998 PaddlePaddle/Paddle and ★282 PaddlePaddle/docs (all-time). Verified file samples show real code/test changes across core APIs, not just window dressing—your work actually lands in one of the biggest AI framework repos, even if it's all compatibility patch grunt work.
Community influence
2.5/8
9 followers, 19 following—your follower count is lower than the number of repos you've forked, and you're following more people than follow you, a classic signal of someone fishing for clout instead of building something people care about.
Activity authenticity
14/17
340 contributions last year, active as of today—no ghostwriter signs, you're actually putting in the hours, just all of it is directed at other people's projects and templated patches.
Red flags
Repetitive templated contribution pattern: 67% of your recent merged PRs use nearly identical [API Compatibility] titles and follow the same patch structure, suggesting you're working off a fixed task list rather than driving original, self-directed work.
Barren original project portfolio: 22 of your 23 original repos have 0 stars, your top original repo is a LangChain agent template with no traction, and your "llama" repo is just redistributed Meta Llama 2 weights with no original engineering.
Asymmetric social and curation metrics: You follow 19 accounts but only have 9 followers, and your 25 fork repos vastly outnumber your original project star count, signaling you're curating/consuming open source far more than you're building it.
Score calibration
No extra adjustment. The base score of 63.8 already accounts for your strong all-time ecosystem impact against your weak original project portfolio and repetitive contribution style; no additional bump or haircut was needed.
Verdict
Normal average contributor. You're a reliable grunt worker for large open-source projects, with no red flags for spam, fraud, or bad faith, but your profile lacks any standalone engineering signal to push you into a higher tier. Keep shipping those compatibility patches, but maybe try building something people actually want to star someday.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
