Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 All your original repos combine for just 25 stars, 23 from a HoMM3 side tool and the other 7 are 0-1 star wastelands; you also fired 5 near-identical PRs to update the same student coursework file, ev
rudnovd — 61.40/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 10-year-old account with one legitimate high-star library contribution and a niche HoMM3 side project, bogged down by trivial PRs to student repos and a lineup of zero-star personal projects that read like a half-assembled open-source business card.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 10.7 years old, 12 active contribution years, 206 contributions last year — you’ve had a decade to stop treating GitHub like a homework submission portal. |
| Original project quality | 9.3/18 | 7 original repos, total 25 stars, 23 of which are stuck on your HoMM3 side tool; the other 6 repos are 0-1 star wastelands, including a 37-byte movies-page repo that’s barely a placeholder. |
| Contribution quality | 15.8/27 | 18 merged PRs total, 2 maintainer-closed unmerged, 2 author-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs; 5 of your recent merged PRs are near-identical updates to the same student coursework RST file, and 2 are trivial one-line changes. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 11.1/20 | 2 PRs + 1 commit into 24.7k and 22.3k star repos (vueuse/vueuse and vuejs/devtools-v6) all-time; only 1 of those contributions has a verifiable file sample, the other is unconfirmed. |
| Community influence | 2.8/8 | 6 followers, 9 following — you follow 50% more people than follow you, a follower ratio that would make any micro-influencer cringe. |
| Activity authenticity | 12.4/17 | 206 contributions last year, but nearly a third of your recent merged PRs are trivial or duplicate updates to the same student file, making your activity look more like a metric-chasing exercise than real open-source work. |
Red flags
- One of your two all-time contributions to popular high-star repos (the PR to vuejs/devtools-v6) has no verifiable file-level sample to confirm it was substantive, not a drive-by contribution.
- Your recent PR sample includes 5 near-identical updates to the same
2016.fo-340005.rststudent coursework file in theustu/studentsrepo, which reads like bulk PR farming for contribution metrics rather than meaningful work. - 5 of your 7 original public repos have 0 stars, and 1 has only 1 star, meaning your personal project portfolio is almost entirely a barren wasteland with no real user interest.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already correctly accounts for your one substantive high-star library contribution, the high quality of your HoMM3 side tool project, and the lack of unaddressed farming patterns or misclassified contribution types.
Verdict Normal, unremarkable contributor. You have one solid proof-of-work PR to a major library and a decent niche side project, but the rest of your GitHub activity is either trivial, duplicated, or hosted on zero-star repos that no one visits. You’re not a bad actor, you’re just not particularly notable — a perfectly average open-source hobbyist who hasn’t built anything worth watching beyond your one HoMM3 tool.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
[](https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/rudnovd" alt="GitHub Roast score badge" /></a>[](https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd)[](https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/rudnovd?theme=dark" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a><a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/rudnovd"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/rudnovd?theme=light" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>