Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 13-year GitHub account with 63 followers, nearly half your recent PRs are trivial patches for big-name projects, and you spammed 3 near-identical Yahoo Finance fixes — your open-source resume is just
SEIAROTg — 77.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid 14-year contributor with real engineering credits to CPython, Podman, and NixOS, but recent trivial PR spam and a follower count smaller than your following list keep you firmly in middle-tier obscurity.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 13.36 years, active across 14 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — you’ve been on GitHub longer than most users have been alive online, and you never quit. |
| Original project quality | 13/18 | 27 original repos with 616 total stars, top star 366 on quadlet-nix (quality score 0.85, a real usable Nix/Podman tool), plus the autobean beancount tool suite with active PyPI publishing — no empty fork graveyards, no star inflation, just actual usable tools. |
| Contribution quality | 19.3/27 | 15 merged of 19 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 self-closed external PR; recent 15 PR sample has 7 trivial entries (46.7% trivial ratio) including 3 near-duplicate Yahoo Finance fixes across beancount repos — you ship code that gets merged, but a lot of it is low-lift window dressing on other people's projects. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 17.9/20 | 9 PRs + 7 commits across 5 popular repos totaling 137,228 stars (including CPython, Podman, NixOS/nixpkgs), with 4 core and 2 doc-like changes in the verified file sample — you’re not just polishing docs, you’ve landed real changes in projects that power millions of workflows. |
| Community influence | 4.2/8 | 63 followers, 98 following — your contribution breadth is way bigger than your audience, no influencer energy, just quiet work that doesn’t draw a crowd. |
| Activity authenticity | 13.5/17 | 70 contributions last year across 4 activity types, no bot-like spikes or erratic gaps — steady, human-paced work, no fake activity here. |
Red flags
- Nearly half your recent merged PR sample (7 of 15) are trivial changes, including 3 near-identical Yahoo Finance API fixes sent to separate beancount repos — this low-effort bulk patching looks more like KPI hunting than meaningful engineering, even if it’s not abusive.
- Follower count (63) is shockingly low for a 13-year account with credits to CPython, Podman, and NixOS/nixpkgs, suggesting your work doesn’t resonate enough to build a community.
- One external PR was self-closed before merge, a small but unflattering blip in your otherwise clean PR record.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base 77.9 already accounts for your strong all-time popular-repo impact, solid original project quality, and the minor drag from trivial recent PR volume and low community reach.
Verdict Normal, reliable open-source contributor with real engineering credits to big-name projects, but held back by recent low-value PR volume and a nearly non-existent community footprint. You’re the dependable handyman of open source, not the star architect — solid, but not memorable.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
[](https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/seiarotg" alt="GitHub Roast score badge" /></a>[](https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg)[](https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/seiarotg?theme=dark" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a><a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/seiarotg"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/seiarotg?theme=light" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>