🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🌐 Julia implementation of webview, a tiny library for creating web-based desktop GUIs.
JuliaCall NodeJS from Julia.
JuliaSimple tools for playing Pokémon VGC.
VueUse alternative mirrors to manage your packages for Julia.
Julia一个转换（简体）文本成日语汉字的工具..
PythonScripts for building a mirror for the Julia language.
Python🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 14-year-old account with only 212 total home stars, top project capped at 72 stars, 406 contributions last year followed by 127 days of radio silence, 18 PRs to TensorFlow/Tesseract with zero verifiab
sunoru — 77.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Long tenure and legitimate big-repo PRs can't mask a barren home project portfolio and a 4-month activity blackout — you're solid, not standout, and your GitHub presence is way less impressive than your resume implies.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 14.35 years registered, 15 years of active contributions — the only thing older than your account is the last push to your top-starred archived mirror project (PkgMirrors.jl, last updated 2021). |
| Original project quality | 9.5/18 | 49 nonempty original repos, 212 total stars, top project Webviews.jl (37 stars) — your home turf has the star count of a mid-tier hobby project, and your highest-starred original repo is already a deprecated archive. |
| Contribution quality | 23.2/27 | 80 merged PRs out of 95 total, 5 maintainer-closed unmerged, 6 self-abandoned external PRs — your PR hit rate is decent, but you've left a small graveyard of self-closed external work that suggests you start more than you finish. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 18 all-time PRs + 18 commits into 8 high-star popular repos, including TensorFlow (196k stars) and Tesseract (75k stars) — you've got legitimate mileage on big-name projects, even if none of it made it into the verifiable quality sample. |
| Community influence | 5.6/8 | 226 followers, 133 following — your follower count is barely higher than your fork count (72), so you're not a community magnet, just a quiet consistent contributor. |
| Activity authenticity | 9.4/17 | 406 contributions last year, but 127 days since last public activity, only 1 tracked activity type — your recent output looks like a short burst that fizzled out, not a steady cadence of real work. |
Red flags
- Your highest-starred original project (PkgMirrors.jl, 72 stars) has been archived since 2021, so your best home-turf work is already a deprecated footnote.
- All 18 of your all-time popular-repo contributions lack verifiable file-level samples, so there is no concrete proof any of that work touched core code rather than docs, site, or tooling.
- 127 days of no public activity following a 406-contribution year makes your recent output look like a short burst rather than a steady, trustworthy cadence.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounted for your 14-year tenure, legitimate big-repo contributions, low 6% PR rejection rate, and lack of PR flooding or templated bulk submissions, with no missed qualitative signals to modify the score.
Verdict Normal. You're a legitimate, low-drama open-source contributor with a solid track record on big-name projects, but your anemic home turf, 4-month activity blackout, and unverifiable big-repo work mean you're far from elite, and your "Solid · Trustworthy" label is well-earned but unexciting.