Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 9-year account with 30 original repos totaling just 22 stars (top repo: 6 stars) and 89 fork repos, you flood other people’s projects with PRs while your own turf is a barren wasteland — GitHub is jus
XieJiSS — 86.60/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: High-volume, low-rejection cross-ecosystem contributor with a 9-year track record, but your own project portfolio is so starved it’s clear you’d rather do free work for other people’s repos than build anything worth starring yourself.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 9.52 years, active across 11 contribution years, last activity 50 days ago — you’ve been on GitHub longer than most modern frontend frameworks have existed, even if your own repos haven’t aged nearly as well. |
| Original project quality | 6.8/18 | 30 original repos with a combined 22 total stars, top original repo (MidiShow-MidiDownloader-vbs) only 6 stars — your home turf is so barren, the only thing growing there is cobwebs, not stars. |
| Contribution quality | 27.6/27 | 161 merged PRs out of 190 total, only 5 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (3% rejection rate), 14 author-closed external PRs, 2 author-closed own-repo PRs — you don’t spam random low-quality PRs, you actually land the vast majority of them, even if a large chunk are doc updates for PLCT-Weekly. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 146 PRs + 145 commits across 23 popular repos with a combined 300k+ stars, including rustdesk (117k stars), DefinitelyTyped (51k stars), and facebook/rocksdb (31k stars) — you’ve made more tangible impact in other people’s engines than you have in your own empty garage. |
| Community influence | 6.3/8 | 150 followers, following 22 — your follower count is higher than the total star count of all your original repos combined, a weird flex that says more about your clout-chasing than your code quality. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.9/17 | 2420 contributions last year across 3 activity types, no evidence of templated PR flooding or star inflation — your activity is genuine, just almost entirely focused on contributing to other people’s projects instead of building your own. |
Red flags
- Nearly half (48%) of your recent merged PRs are docs/site/examples updates, with 12 of your 16 all-time doc-like popular-repo contributions being PLCT-Weekly markdown edits — you’re polishing other people’s windows, not rebuilding their engines.
- Your 30 original repos have a combined 22 stars, with most sitting at 0 stars, and 89 of your 119 total repos are forks — your own project portfolio is a ghost town that no one visits, not even you.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. Your 3% PR rejection rate and 161 landed PRs already carry the score; the only thing holding it back from the 90s is your 22-star original project graveyard.
Verdict Legitimate, high-volume open-source gig worker — you’re not faking contributions, you just prefer doing free labor for other people’s 100k-star repos than building anything worth starring under your own name.
📌 Pin to your GitHub profile
Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.
[](https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/xiejiss" alt="GitHub Roast score badge" /></a>[](https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss)[](https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss)<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/xiejiss?theme=dark" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a><a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/xiejiss"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/xiejiss?theme=light" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>