🔥 GitHub Roast
@gaearonThis open-source track record has real weight
AnonymousProject quality checks out
@yyx990803Community signal is loud
AnonymousThose tags say more than a resume
@sindresorhusLooks like a Hall of Fame regular
AnonymousScore and attention both hold up
@torvaldsWorth opening the GitHub profile
AnonymousHard to argue with this score
@gaearonThis open-source track record has real weight
AnonymousProject quality checks out
@yyx990803Community signal is loud
AnonymousThose tags say more than a resume
@sindresorhusLooks like a Hall of Fame regular
AnonymousScore and attention both hold up
@torvaldsWorth opening the GitHub profile
AnonymousHard to argue with this score
← Back to Hall of Fame
@xmarmalade
Xmarmalade
xmarmalade
66.90/100
🫥 NPC
Average · Unremarkable
#Fork收藏家#文档镀金侠#项目偏食症#星图注水户#Fork Hoarder#Doc Gilder#Project Picky Eater#Star Diluter

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality12.6 / 18
Contribution quality17.7 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.8 / 20
Community influence5.7 / 8
Activity authenticity13.1 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 With 10 years on GitHub you’ve only shipped 2 original repos, padding your profile with 38 forks that are just a digital junk drawer of bookmarks, even a 1-line docs tweak to a 93k-star bun repo is ju

Xmarmalade — 66.90/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A decade-long GitHub account with a single solid original project and a profile dominated by forks and low-effort external PRs; competent enough to ship usable software, but completely unremarkable as an open-source contributor.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 10.43 years, active across 11 contribution years, last activity 13 days ago — a decade on the platform, and you’ve used it to build a fork graveyard instead of a real portfolio.
Original project quality12.6/182 original repos, top star 2452 for alisthelper (a usable Flutter alist client, quality score 0.72) — the only actual software you’ve shipped, and it’s the only thing keeping your score from flatlining.
Contribution quality17.7/2711 merged PRs out of 13 total; 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 0 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs — your PR acceptance rate is fine, but 2 recent merged PRs are trivial (a 5-line docs tweak to oven-sh/bun, a 2-line binary version bump to dart_vlc), and most external work is small tweaks, not core engineering.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.8/205 all-time substantial PRs/commits into popular repos, including that trivial bun docs change (93k stars) and a feature PR to SkytilsMod (1452 stars) — your impact score is inflated by the star counts of the projects you touched, not the depth of the work you did.
Community influence5.7/863 followers, following only 8 — your follower count is barely higher than your original repo count, and you’re not a community draw; you’re a background dev who mostly keeps to your own fork collection.
Activity authenticity13.1/17143 contributions last year, 3 activity types — not a bot, but your activity is mostly CI workflow updates to your own repos and small PRs to others, not consistent core development.

Red flags

  • 38 out of 40 public repos are forks, with almost no original work outside of alisthelper and ice_live_viewer — your profile is a GitHub bookmarks folder, not a developer portfolio.
  • Your ecosystem impact is artificially inflated by low-effort contributions: a 5-line docs tweak to a 93k-star project (oven-sh/bun) and a 2-line binary version bump to dart_vlc are counted as "substantial impact", overstating your technical depth.
  • 2 of your 11 recent merged PRs are trivial, and your external work is mostly small tweaks to mid-sized projects rather than core engineering contributions — your contribution quality is much shallower than the raw PR count suggests.
  • Verified impact PR file-level coverage is incomplete for 2 of your 5 impact PRs, so we can’t fully confirm the depth of the work you did on those popular projects.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your 38-fork profile, low depth of most external PRs, and the inflated impact from low-effort contributions to high-star projects.

Verdict Normal, but completely unremarkable. You can ship a usable Flutter app and toss small PRs at popular repos, but your GitHub presence is mostly fork padding and low-effort contributions, so you’re not a standout open-source contributor by any stretch.

📌 Pin to your GitHub profile

Copy any snippet below into your Profile README. The score stays up to date automatically, and the image links to your detail page.

Badge
GitHub Roast score badge
Markdown
[![GitHub Roast score badge](https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/xmarmalade)](https://githubroast.dev/u/xmarmalade)
HTML
<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/xmarmalade"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/badge/xmarmalade" alt="GitHub Roast score badge" /></a>
Flex card
GitHub Roast
Markdown
[![GitHub Roast](https://githubroast.dev/api/card/xmarmalade)](https://githubroast.dev/u/xmarmalade)
HTML
<a href="https://githubroast.dev/u/xmarmalade"><img src="https://githubroast.dev/api/card/xmarmalade" alt="GitHub Roast" width="600" /></a>